Utilizing the screening tool, you selected from module 2, you will complete, record, and submit a role-play mock interview with a classmate who has experienced a fictional traumatic event. During the mock interview, please describe the tool, explain the purpose of the tool, and demonstrate your ability to administer the tool with your client. The interview must be video recorded. You will also write a brief (900 – 1100 words) critical self-evaluation of your interview and submit the completed screening tool with your self-evaluation.
VIDEO LINK—–>
Screening/Assessment Interview and Recorded Role Play Rubric
|
Unsatisfactory |
Marginal |
Proficient |
Exemplary |
||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||
|
Role Play Interview (25) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 6.2, 7.1] |
Interview was not recorded or is not available for review and evaluation. (0 points) |
Interview inconsistently follows the selected tool format; a description of the tool and purpose for use was somewhat demonstrated in a professional manner; verbal and non-verbal clinical engagement skills such as empathy, eye-contact, and conversational pacing are demonstrated at an elementary level of mastery; facilitation skills such as session opening/closing, topic transitions and active listening are demonstrated incompletely or awkwardly. (17.5 points) |
Interview consistently follows the selected tool format; a description of the tool and purpose for use was partially demonstrated in a professional manner, verbal and non-verbal clinical engagement skills such as empathy, eye-contact, and conversational pacing are demonstrated at a proficient level of mastery; facilitation skills such as session opening/closing, topic transitions and active listening are mostly consistent and demonstrated with thoroughness. (21.25 points) |
Interview consistently follows selected tool format; a description of the tool and purpose for use was demonstrated in a developmentally appropriate manner, verbal and non-verbal clinical engagement skills such as empathy, eye-contact, and conversational pacing are demonstrated with professionalism and sophisticated mastery; facilitation skills such as session opening/closing, topic transitions and active listening are consistently demonstrated with thoroughness and evident skill, ease and confidence. (25 points) |
|||
|
Critical Self-Evaluation (25) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.1] |
Self-evaluation does not meet the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection lacks depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are not analyzed; no areas for personal improvement are identified or discussed. (0-5 points) |
Self-evaluation does not meet the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection demonstrates superficial depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are incompletely analyzed; one area for personal improvement is identified and/or discussed (17.5 point) |
Self-evaluation meets the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection generally demonstrates depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are thoroughly analyzed; two or three areas for personal improvement are identified and/or discussed. (21.25 points) |
Self-evaluation meets the target length of 900-1100 words; reflection demonstrates emotionally sophisticated depth, self-awareness and insight about personal development and professional skills; verbal and non-verbal facilitation skills are thoroughly and thoughtfully analyzed; four or more areas for personal improvement are identified and discussed. (25 points) |
|||
|
Screening/Assessment Instrument (15) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.5] |
The selected screening/assessment instrument is not submitted for review (0 points) |
The selected screening/assessment instrument is submitted for review; is only partially completed; is completed by hand rather than electronically; is summarized/scored incompletely and/or with multiple errors. (10.5 points) |
The selected screening/assessment instrument is submitted for review; is almost entirely completed; is completed electronically; is summarized/scored completely and almost entirely correctly (12.75 points) |
The selected screening/assessment instrument is submitted for review; is thoroughly completed; is completed electronically; is summarized/scored completely and correctly (13-15 points) |
|||
|
Writing Quality (10) [EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.5] |
The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument have multiple spelling, grammar and/or construction errors on each page. (0 points) |
The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument has several spelling, grammar and/or construction errors on each page. (7 points) |
The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument are written fluently, with no more than a few minor spelling, grammar and/or construction errors throughout. (8.5 points) |
The self-evaluation and screening/assessment instrument are written fluently and demonstrate sophisticated language use, with no apparent errors. (10 points) |
|||
