You will submit the Recommendations and Global Considerations portion of the final project. The purpose of this assignment is to suggest relevant changes to the organization it self and changes to the ethical guidelines that could have prevented the incident.
Prompt
Suggest relevant changes to the organization itself and changes to the ethical guidelines that could have prevented the incident. Standards external to the organization that may have helped prevent the incident should also be proposed. This assignment will also address international compliance standards and how they would have been relevant to the incident. The impact of the incident on global communication and commerce will be analyzed, as well as the impact on the global technology environment.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Recommendations
- Propose relevant changes to the organization that may have prevented the incident. How would these changes have helped to prevent the occurrence?
- Propose reasonable ethical guidelines that could have helped prevent the incident and that might help the organization prevent future incidents. Propose changes to the standards external to the organization that might have helped prevent the incident. This can include changes to regulations and regulatory and ethical standards that might exist today but did not exist or were not properly delivered at the time of the incident. Be sure to support your conclusions.
- Global Considerations
- What international compliance standards (either at the time of the incident or today) would have been relevant to the incident, and how? If your company is not global, imagine that is.
- Analyze the impact of the incident on global communication and commerce (again, if your organization is not global, imagine otherwise). In other words, what impact did (or would) the incident have on views and use of information technology and communication in global contexts?
- Global Technology Environment: Based on your research and analysis of this case, determine the global legal and regulatory impacts this case had on the information technology overall. In other words, determine the relationship between this case and the global regulatory standards that are now in place, will be put in place shortly, or should be put in place as a result of this or related incident(s).
What to Submit
The format for this assignment will be a three- to five-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Milestone Three Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (90%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendations: Organizational Changes | Meets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into solving organizational issues | Proposes and defends relevant changes to the organization that would have helped prevent the incident | Proposes and defends changes to the organization, but changes are not relevant or not comprehensively defended, or would not have helped prevent the incident | Does not propose and defend changes to the organization | 15 |
| Recommendations: Ethical Guidelines | Meets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into the nuanced ethical standard needs of organizations | Proposes reasonable ethical guidelines that could have helped prevent the incident and that might help prevent future incidents within the organization | Proposes ethical guidelines, but guidelines are not reasonable or would not have helped prevent the incident or would not prevent future incidents within the organization | Does not propose ethical guidelines for the organization | 15 |
| Recommendations: External Standards | Meets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into the nuanced considerations required when recommending external standards for organizations to follow | Proposes external standards that may have helped prevent the incident, with relevant and logical support | Proposes external standards with support, but the standards would not have helped prevent the incident, or the support is not relevant or logical given the case | Does not propose external standards with support | 15 |
| Global Considerations: International Compliance | Meets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into the application of international standards | Accurately identifies and explains in detail the international compliance standards relevant to the incident | Identifies and explains the international compliance standards relevant to the incident, but with gaps in accuracy or detail | Does not identify and explain the international compliance standards relevant to the incident | 15 |
| Global Considerations: Cultural Impacts | Meets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into cultural perspectives toward cyber communication and commerce within a global context | Accurately analyzes the impact of the incident on cyber communication and commerce from the larger cultural perspective | Analyzes the impact of the incident on cyber communication and commerce globally but not in terms of the larger cultural perspective or with gaps in accuracy | Does not analyze the impact of the incident on cyber communication and commerce globally | 15 |
| Global Considerations: Global Technology Environment | Meets “Proficient” criteria and evidences a nuanced, in-depth understanding of global legal impacts of related cases | Analyzes in detail the global legal and regulatory impact of this or similar cases to determine global laws and regulations that resulted or should have resulted | Analyzes the global legal and regulatory impact of this or similar cases to determine global laws and regulations that resulted or should have resulted, but with gaps in detail | Does not analyze the global legal and regulatory impact of this or similar cases to determine global laws and regulations that resulted or should have resulted | 15 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 10 |
| Total: 100% | |||||
